HomeBlogBlogVAT in Crypto SeriesWhen Is Executing Crypto Orders VAT-Exempt? Broker vs Platform Matters

When Is Executing Crypto Orders VAT-Exempt? Broker vs Platform Matters

As MiCA brings structure to crypto-asset services, two activities stand out as particularly tricky for VAT: execution of orders and reception & transmission of orders.

On paper, they look almost identical — taking client instructions and ensuring trades happen. But VAT legislation cares less about labels and more about how the service is delivered. Are you acting as a broker/intermediary (negotiation), or just providing technical infrastructure (a taxable service)?

That distinction is what determines whether your fees are exempt or standard-rated.

What MiCA Says

  • Execution of Orders (Art. 3(1)(21))
    “The conclusion of agreements, on behalf of clients, to purchase or sell one or more crypto-assets … including contracts at the moment of their offer to the public or admission to trading.”
  • Reception and Transmission of Orders (Art. 3(1)(23))
    “The reception from a person of an order to purchase or sell … and the transmission of that order to a third party for execution.”

In practice, these two services are the crypto equivalents of traditional brokerage activities.

The Key VAT Principle: Negotiation vs. Technical Service

EU VAT law (Article 135 of the VAT Directive) and CJEU case law (CSC Financial Services C-235/00; Ludwig C-453/05) draw a sharp line between two categories of service:

  • Negotiation (VAT-exempt)
    • Actively executes the order on behalf of a client;
    • Participates in bringing counterparties together and concluding the transaction;
    • Provides more than just technical or infrastructural support;
    • Comparable to a traditional stockbroker’s role.
  • Technical Services (Taxable)
    • Providing automated infrastructure (APIs, matching engines, dashboards);
    • CASP is not “in the loop” of the financial flow, only offering the tool;
    • Treated as a taxable digital/technical service.

The Maltese VAT Guidelines for DLT Assets mirror this distinction almost word-for-word. They clarify that exemption only applies when the CASP is genuinely carrying out financial intermediation, i.e. acting as a negotiator or broker in the sense recognised by EU case law. Where the CASP simply provides “mere technological services” — such as hosting a trading interface or order-matching engine — the service may be regarded as outside the scope of the financial exemptions and therefore fully taxable.

VAT Treatment by Token Type

🔹 Payment Tokens

  • Exempt if the CASP executes or transmits orders as a broker (Art. 135(1)(e), backed by Hedqvist C-264/14).
  • Taxable if the CASP only provides infrastructure.

🔹 Security Tokens

  • Exempt if the CASP actively negotiates or executes trades (Art. 135(1)(f)), consistent with securities brokerage.
  • Taxable if the CASP limits its role to technical access.

🔹 Utility or Other Tokens

  • Always taxable — these tokens are not financial in nature, so no exemptions apply.
  • Execution or transmission fees are subject to VAT (or reverse charge/OSS depending on client location).

This split follows the same principle we highlighted in our earlier articles on exchanges and custody: VAT legislation looks at both the function of the token and the nature of the service. A CASP brokering trades in Bitcoin will fall under a very different VAT regime than one routing orders in a platform utility token — even if the service model looks identical on the surface.

This means the same service could be exempt in B2B but taxable in B2C depending on whether the CASP is a broker or platform provider.

Summary Table – Execution & Reception/Transmission of Orders

Summary Table – Execution & Reception/Transmission of Orders

Final Thoughts

For CASPs, the difference between being a broker and being a platform provider isn’t just operational — it’s fiscal.

  • If you’re actively executing or transmitting orders as an intermediary, you may qualify for VAT exemption (at least for payment and security tokens).
  • If you’re only offering infrastructure, you’re providing a taxable service.

The compliance takeaway is clear: classify both your service model and the token type before deciding VAT treatment. Get this wrong, and you risk mischarging VAT on every trade.

📌 Written by Zachary Cachia – FCCA, FIA, CPA

Disclaimer

This article is for general information only and does not constitute tax, legal, or financial advice. Always consult a qualified advisor for tailored guidance.

© 2025 Helix Partners. All rights reserved.

Helix Partners’ is a group of collaborative organisations including Helix Advisory Limited and Helix Finance Limited, providing different regulated and unregulated service lines. Whilst ‘Helix Partners’ brands as collaborative entities, services are provided by each independent entity, and where required by warranted and/or licensed companies and individuals. When any licensed accounting service is provided, this is carried out by Helix Finance Ltd a company registered company in Malta with reg. no. C97030 and is registered as an Accountancy & Audit Firm with the Accountancy Board with reg. no. AB/2/23/106. When any legal service is provided such is carried out by Dr Michael Muscat LL.D, a warranted legal professional in Malta.